Tag Archives: politics

Dangerous Cult Similarities in the Mormon Church, Branch Davidians and Jonestown

10 Oct

David Koresh

Jim Jones

These cults have some very clear similarities that classify them, by definition, as a cult. One of these is: the group is elitist, claiming a special, exalted status for itself, its leader(s), and members (for example: the leader is considered the Messiah or an avatar; the group and/or the leader has a special mission to save humanity). Joseph Smith, in starting his Mormon Church of Latter Day Saints, proclaimed he was a direct descendant of Jesus and his followers can become gods themselves, replete with their own worlds to rule with a plethora of wives. He urged followers to take up arms against the U.S. militia and died as a “martyr”. Branch Davidian leader David Koresh proclaimed messiah status in 1990 when he changed his name from Timothy Howell and strongly favored polygamy for himself and also dealt in illegal firearms. People’s Temple cult leader James Jones proclaimed exalted status where members even signed over custody of their children to Jones. All three men proclaimed a sense of divinity and demanded allegiance through intimidation and threats towards their followers. All three led their followers to an untimely, violent death in defense of the cult and its leaders.

My primary issue with the Mormon candidate, Mitt Romney is, how can he believe the fallacious assertions made by Joseph Smith as veritable and still be considered a logical human being, let alone a candidate for president if he’s a devout follower of such cultish nonsense? In my opinion, all religions have fantastical notions but usually, have some fairly valid historical premises, based on love and inclusion essentially. The Mormon cult is another case altogether. Everything about the history of this religion has categorically been proven false by scientific evidence. Joseph Smith was a magnanimous megalomaniac with a penchant for drama.  A church without theater wouldn’t last long, Smith believed.   The ritualistic nature of Temple Endowment Ceremonies, for instance, show a unique interpretation of the Masonic rites they were modeled after.   People need the fantasy, the performance and the mystery, which Smith provided in his founding of a new church—rife with rituals, stories of travel from faraway lands and theatrical acts of mystical translations that are at the core of the church’s history.  A new “gospel” is easier to sell with the extravagant pomp, circumstance and surreptitiousness of the Mormon Church.

20121010-083557.jpg

Mormon Cult founder Joseph Smith

The utterly violent and devastating end to both the Branch Davidians and the Guyana Settlement at Jonestown are eerily similar to Brigham Young ordering non-LDS settlers to be slaughtered in the Mountain Meadows Massacre. A cult that will kill with the intention of protecting its interests and the secrecy of its faith should be considered suspect. Moreover, the incident remains buried in political turmoil, even to this day, and was a media sensation for more than 20 years after it happened. Most Mormons know nothing of the original 9/11 and they’d like to keep it that way.

Another technique used by cults is to discourage the acquisition of information and to keep the indoctrinated firmly rooted in the faith.   A recent ploy used by LDS hierarchy to keep its young cult members in the dark is the lowering of the age of missionary service to 18 (from 19). Years of indoctrination and brainwashing could easily be lost with a year spent at a liberal arts college, so LDS President Monson and Company aren’t taking any chances.  They are reluctant to lose any potential tithing members who will perpetually contribute 10% of their net worth to the post mortem afterlife insurance policy.  It is absolutely amazing how many people buy into this fraud, yet it is far more terrifying for our President to subscribe to this nonsense.

End Times predictions abound in cults, the Mormons being no exception. Gun ownership is certainly encouraged. The Mormon Church owns one of the most active and unregulated gun sale portals on the web, according to a national investigation released by the New York City Mayor’s office. The website in question is KSL.com, the online hub for Utah’s NBC affiliate and sister radio station, which are both owned and operated by the for-profit arm of the Mormon Church. In addition to local news, KSL.com produces a popular classifieds section that reaches millions of users well beyond Utah. Jim Jones’ murdering of Congressman Leo Ryan in 1978, the mass suicide and the fiery Branch Davidian siege in 1993 remind us of the drastic measures cult leaders and their followers will resort to if they feel threatened.

Anyone can say that all religions have cultish characteristics, and, to a degree, they’d be right.  But for a religion, in this era of technology and information, to assert such provably false claims as veracious is preposterous.  Jesus Christ was a figure who preached peace, tolerance and acceptance.  The Mormon Church, like others cults, has a history of violence, exclusion and bigotry, no matter how much they try to hide the facts.  It is certainly not a faith which should supercede the United States Constitution by the Leader of the Free World.

About these ads

Why Political Candidates’ Beliefs Are Important

27 Aug

This is a re-post from the sagacious Mark Larsen. A former Mormon who served his mission in Argentina, Mr. Larsen is a professor who has most definitely parted ways with the Church. He has compiled this fantastic list from his site Heresies, Blasphemies, Sacrilege! I felt it was such a tremendous list of the pertinent questions to ask anyone running for public office, especially Willard Romney! I encourage readers to view all the articles on his site.

Here is his post entitled: Why Political Candidate’s Beliefs Are Important

There are SO many questions about Romney’s Mormonism that I would LOVE journalists to ask him point blank!

I opine that one’s religious views are just as important —perhaps more important— than one’s political philosophy. As my psychologist spouse informs me: for all practical intents and purposes it is impossible to separate “private” beliefs from public attitudes, prejudices, decisions, and behavior.

For example, when it comes to Mormonism in particular (and many other Christian religions)…

  • If a person privately deems homosexuality a sin, a choice, a perversion, condemned by god, can I trust that individual to labor to establish equal rights for gays and lesbians, including marriage?
  • If someone believes that humans were once male or female “spirits” in a pre-mortal existence, and god then puts them into corresponding male or female bodies, how supportive will the person be of legislation, let alone public health practices, to help transgender children establish and live according to their genetic identity?
  • If someone believes that there are “spirit children” in “heaven,” anxiously lined up, waiting for their chance to finally come to earth and get a physical body before the “second coming,” how would it affect the person’s views on overpopulation in a finite world with finite resources?
  • How would that same belief affect the person’s views on tax laws that allow more and more deductions for families who choose to have more and more children?
  • If someone believes that god gave humans “dominion” over the entire earth, to do with as we please, and that the “second coming” is nigh, that Jesus will descend from heaven to cleanse the earth of sinners and rule over the remaining righteous believers for a thousand years in the near future, should I assume that view will not have an effect upon the person’s decisions that affect the environment, global warming, even industrial pollution? It won’t have any effect on efforts to move to cleaner, renewable sources of energy rather than deciding to “drill, baby, drill” until the fossil fuels are completely gone?
  • If someone believes the earth is less than 10,000 years old, that Adam and Eve were how humans came to exist, will it not taint his/her decisions about funding and support for science education in our public schools?
  • If someone believes that a fertilized egg, an embryo, a fetus is a human being with a “soul,” god’s ultimate and most sacred creation, will it not affect the person’s votes on issues such as stem cell research, contraception, abortion, women’s rights to make their own choices about reproduction?
  • If a person believes that humans are a “special creation” of god, created in his own image, his ultimate handiwork, his own spirit children, but NOT part of the animal kingdom… and that all those other life forms exist solely for “the benefit and use of man”… would it not influence the person’s stance on laws that regulate hunting animals for sport, using them in laboratory experiments, destroying their habitat for commercial gain, exposing them to toxic waste, abusing them, protecting endangered species?
  • If someone believes that, as declared in Mormon scripture, “thou wast chosen before thou wast born,” and thus reserved to come to earth as one of the elect saints in the latter-days before the second coming, does it not affect the person’s political view that “all men are created equal”?
  • If a person believes, like Romney, that he/she is a literal descendant of Ephraim, and thus one of god’s “chosen people of Israel,” will it not affect his/her public views, influence, and decisions regarding conflicts in the Middle East?
  • If someone believes that god orchestrated the establishment of the United States of America, can I trust that person to enforce the separation of church and state?
  • If an individual is obedient to a religion’s hierarchy, believes that such leaders are divinely inspired, that they speak for god on earth, will that person advocate eliminating loopholes in the tax code so that clergy and churches have to pay their fair share of taxes like everyone else?
  • If a person privately believes that black skin is a curse from god for being a “fence-sitter” in a war between Jesus and Lucifer in a pre-mortal existence, and that god has cursed Native Americans with a red skin for their ancestors’ wickedness, sin, and idolatry, can I really assume that the person’s views and votes on civil rights issues will be free of racial prejudice?
  • Similarly, if someone doggedly purports that Native Americans are descendants of Jews, despite all the historical, archaeological, and biological DNA evidence to the contrary, is that person able to face reality, accept and implement the contributions of science and education when making decisions?
  • If a person believes that god is a patriarch who rules over multiple wives, that likewise practicing said polygamy is an eternal requirement to be with him in the “highest degree of the celestial kingdom” in the afterlife, and that only men can have priesthood power to run and administer god’s church on earth, can I truly trust that person to fight for and defend absolutely equal rights for women in society via legislation and judicial decisions?
  • If someone believes that only god can decide when to “bring a soul home,” how would it affect that person’s attitude towards legislation on euthanasia?
  • If a person believes that a ritual of anointment with “consecrated” oil can cure others of an illness, will it not influence the person’s decisions about medical and health issues that affect the public?
  • If someone believes that there is a “ghost in the machine,” that said ghost will continue to exist in an afterlife, that those who die will someday be reunited with their loved ones again in “heaven,” how would it affect the person’s judgment if and when deciding to send men and women in the military to die in war?
  • If a person believes in a god capable of intervening in our lives with miracles, whose intervention can be summoned by prayer and supplication, can I trust that person to make tough and difficult decisions to solve problems by relying solely upon human intellect, abilities, and efforts rather than leaving it “in god’s hands”?
  • If someone believes that his/her underwear is “sacred” and must be worn at all times, day and night, as a protection against “evil,” will the person rely upon scientific data or fall back on supernatural and paranormal beliefs to make pragmatic decisions?
  • If someone is required to pass an interview every year to sustain the head of his/her church as the one and only “prophet, seer, and revelator” of God on earth, is that person obligated to submit to that religious leader’s will on all matters, whether private or public, religious or political?
  • If in that same interview a person agrees to never “affiliate with, or agree with any group or individual whose teachings or practices are contrary to or oppose those accepted by” the person’s church, can I safely assume that said individual will treat all citizens equally under the law?
  • If a person has already taken an oath to “consecrate himself, his time, talents, and everything with which the Lord has blessed him, or with which he may bless him, to his church, for the building up of the kingdom of God on the earth and for the establishment of Zion,” can I trust that individual to give loyalty to our country top priority while in office?

Sigh…. I could go on and on and on —and have, obviously. You can see that society’s hands-off deference to religion as a “sacred cow,” a “tabu” subject, really irks me. My point is that those oh-so-private religious beliefs cannot help but have real effects on real people in the real world. Like Richard Dawkins, I want to know what makes a candidate “tick” before casting my vote.

Follow Mark on Twitter @Yanquetino

Willard’s Olympic-Sized Gaffes Don’t Faze Obama’s Opponents

31 Jul

If you’d like to use an Olympic metaphor to characterize Willard Romney’s three nation world tour, let’s use gymnastics to elucidate the magnitude of his mistakes. If the trip was a floor exercise routine, he fell on all his tumbling passes and stepped out of bounds while dancing around questions. Add a few insults towards dignitaries, foreign cultures and the press and you have a routine trip laden with deductions. From his time in the United Kingdom just prior to the commencement of the London Olympic Games, on to Israel and then finally off to Poland where his trip ended with a media faux pas, this trip failed to demonstrate his readiness on the world stage. Compared with Senator Obama’s triumphant journey to Europe and Asia in the Summer of 2008, the contrast between these two candidates couldn’t be more stark. Willard Romney went to three nations, generally propitious to his foreign agenda to raise massive funds. This diplomatic fiasco found Willard or his staffers insulting someone in every country, on more than one occasion. In 2008, then Senator Obama drew a crowd of 200,000 in Berlin, all very zealous over the prospect of a potential U.S. leader that would no longer act unilaterally. It was a trip essentially gaffe-free. With Willard’s travels, only Rush Limbaugh found the trip to be a resounding success and he’s essentially alone in his opinion. Apparently, many Americans are as delusional and oblivious as the Oxycontin King of the AM Airwaves.

The Windmill Library, Southwest Las Vegas

Knowing all this, I went to the Obama For America (OFA) Southwest Las Vegas office with elevated spirits today. I was ready to go out to wherever I was needed to register voters and recruit potential volunteers to help reelect my president. The office staff sent me to the Windmill Library, a brand new facility paid for by taxpayers, a sort of socialist project actually. White, Asian, Hispanic and Black families alike walked into the library on this drizzly July morning. Security informed me I was not permitted to sit under any covered area and had to remain about twenty-five feet from the entrance. In fact, the moment I arrived with my clipboard, a woman asked angrily if I had a permit. Sensing the hostility, I informed the library staff of my presence. and that was sufficient. There really should be no objection to registering all voters in a democratic society, yet I was immediately treated with suspicion. Perhaps this negative attitude is the result of ALEC’s stated goal of limiting voter participation and Fox News has been the perfect vehicle to deliver this convoluted message.

After securing my seat by the entrance, I tried to follow the script of the Obama campaign and asked passersby if they were Obama supporters. After about the fifth person who nodded in disgust, I encountered a white man of about sixty-five. I asked this gentlemen my question politely and he said, “hell no, I hate that sonofabitch, I hope he dies.” I reluctantly said, ‘have a nice day’ and pressed on. Another elderly white man said, “I hope you’re asking for I.D.” To which I replied, ‘no, because it is not the law in Nevada.’ I quickly amended my ice-breaker to “are you registered to vote?” because it was obvious I wasn’t changing hearts and minds this time. Maybe I could at least get more people involved. For the most part, the effort was fairly unsuccessful, having only registered one new voter and committed three people to vote Democratic. I suppose every vote counts, so it wasn’t for naught.

Organizing for Nevada: Barack Obama 2012

What’s so unusual about those so vehemently opposed to President Obama is their lack of reason and justification for their strong feelings. Namely, most couldn’t explain what about the president they found so disconcerting. I’d say most of these folks drove cars that would indicate they are middle to working class Americans who would suffer greatly if Willard Romney was elected. However, they were positively convinced President Obama just needed to go, but couldn’t really explain why. It’s obvious most of their opinions have been shaped by Fox News, where there’s seldom a hint of truth to any of their “newscasts.”

I will keep this day foremost in my mind if I get too confident. One might think Willard Romney is a terrible “Etch-A-Sketch” candidate who is easily beatable in November, but this isn’t how the low-information voter perceives reality. We must all work hard to combat all the dirty, corporate money that buys unlimited lies in advertising and alleged “news.” It seems the gaffes of this GOP candidate can’t overshadow the negative press which Koch and Adelson cash can buy. Diligence and perseverance are the only way we’ll beat this unprincipled conservative chameleon and I hope you’re all ready for a fight. We have no choice but to defeat Willard this November. Corporations will be the only people and the actual people will become non-unionized, slave labor.

Prayer Should Really Exit the Political and Medical Arena

23 Jul

Why is it there’s a Prayer Invocation delivered by clergy at every presidential inauguration? In a secular society, where it’s best not to mingle religion and politics, invocations do nothing but cause controversy and disharmony. Who should give the prayer? What should they say? Should any and all religions be invited to give an invocation? And for what purpose?

20120722-200656.jpg

Saddleback Pastor Warren and President Obama 2009

Perhaps I’m overly sensitive to public prayer ceremonies because they stand contrary to my anti-theistic views. I think if one MUST pray, do so in private. Indeed, it is even a matter of scripture that should be honored. Jesus was not a fan of public displays of prayer, as it is written in Matthew, 6:6 – But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly. So if we are indeed a Judeo-Christian Nation, why are we publicly mocking Jesus’ teachings by blatantly engaging in very public displays of prayer?

Saddleback Church Pastor Rick Warren delivered the invocation at the very same inauguration of President Obama where Chief Justice Roberts botched the oath of office delivery. However, after Rick Warren’s comments blaming the Aurora massacre on the teaching of evolution, I’d say he was the worst mistake of President Obama’s big day in 2009.

In addition to Warren, we have this delectable creature, Reverend Newcombe. Jerry Newcombe, Evangelical Leader, Says Only Christian Victims Of Colorado Shooting Going To Heaven. He uttered this completely made up nonsense:“If a Christian dies early, if a Christian dies young, it seems tragic, but really it is not tragic because they are going to a wonderful place.. on the other hand, if a person doesn’t know Jesus Christ.. if they knowingly rejected Jesus Christ, then, basically, they are going to a terrible place.” How compassionate you are, Jerry. If someone believes differently than you, they are condemned to eternal suffering, no matter how innocent they are? Nice god you worship! Preachers like these two monsters ought to stay quiet if they feel the need to offend victims and their families. These “preachers” are completely disgraceful!

Our own GOP candidate, Willard Romney offered his condolences by reading straight from some sort of Bible. Perhaps it was the Book of Mormon? Who knows? All I could tell you was he sounded like a religious leader and NOT a presidential candidate of the United States, where we have freedom of and from religion!

Prayer itself is not harmful per se, but using it to supplant science and medicine can be fatal. There was a case in 2009 in Wisconsin where a couple prayed for their undiagnosed diabetic daughter instead of taking her to a much needed hospital. The case will now be heard by the Supreme Court of the United States. I hope they are not let off as easy at the federal level as they were in Wisconsin.

20120723-070450.jpg

The U.S. Supreme Court Justices

Then there’s another sick story out of Texas where a three day-old infant was also prayed over when it fell ill. The infant was dead for fifteen hours before authorities were called. The family members were “church elders” which means they were, I guess, more connected to god?

The massive increases of whooping cough and other previously eradicated diseases has spiked in the last few years because parents cite religious reasons for not vaccinating children, which endangers ALL PEOPLE. There’s got to be a point where we treat prayer and private religious beliefs as private and completely leave them out of public politics and society. When there’s any kind of proof, scientific proof, prayer actually does any good, then we can bring it back on a limited basis. Since that’s not going to happen anytime soon, I say, leave your gods and prayers out of my government! They’re doing anything but helping.

Romney Camp Backs Away from Nugent After Seeking His Approval

18 Apr

Tagg Romney tweeted this: “Ted Nugent endorsed my Dad today. Ted Nugent? How cool is that?! He joins Kid Rock as great Detroit musicians on team Mitt!” This was a little over a month ago. Now, following Nugent’s incendiary remarks, Team Romney seems to do what they’ve done so often in the past. They are flip-flopping again. This time, after Nugent says “If Obama wins reelection, a year from now I’ll either be dead or in jail. See Romney Campaign Backs Away From Nugent’s Anti-Obama Remark

Nugent in 2007

Can anyone imagine if Obama had actively sought the endorsement of a controversial, albeit violence advocating celebrity? I’m sure we all remember the Jeremiah Wright controversy. The pastor spoke not directly about Obama, yet somehow our President had to explain away the opinions of someone not involved in the campaign. The double standard is quite obvious. If Obama sought out Eminem, and then he spoke about the GOP being “beheaded,” I’m sure Fox News would run it on a reel 24/7.

Jeremiah Wright

Not only is the rhetoric from the Nugent character inflammatory, but his history is quite tattered with very questionable behavior. The man has 8 children with 6 different women. He was involved with a 17-year-old in 1978 which awarded him as #63 in Spin Magazine’s 100 sleaziest rock moments. Check out Personal Life of Ted Nugent Barack Obama can’t even know someone with this type of sordid past without a scrutiny never bestowed on a president in our lifetime.

It is rather humorous how the Romney campaign can do a 180 on pretty much any and all issues/people and the GOP doesn’t bat an eyelash. I truly believe the motivation to beat Obama is just not going to be enough for this candidate. Mitt Romney is far too dirty and unlikable to convince the bigots and haters out there to get off their couches (as Chris Christie admonishes) and cast a vote for the Liberal/Moderate/Conservative Candidate of the GOP. For the sake of all those not in the 1%, I sure as hell hope I am right!

Right Wing Common Denominator: Lives Lost

16 Apr

Essentially, the right wing truly cares little for people outside their circle of wealth. I can’t say it anymore brilliantly than Arthur R. Kamm, PhD. He writes a brilliant blog called Art on Issues. Follow him on Twitter @artonissues. This article contains the ways the GOP & their policies essentially cost lives.
Please read because increased knowledge is more ammunition against these selfish monsters. The Common Denominator of right Wing Policy: LOST LIVES

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 109 other followers

%d bloggers like this: